Two guys, Sovereign and Subject, have an arrangement of sorts. Subject does the work, Sovereign sponges off of him. Subject puts up with it, because Sovereign will beat him up if he doesn’t.
Sovereign has gotten greedy of late. He’s decided to issue bonds backed by Subject, with a guaranteed return rate. He keeps some of the funds raised for himself, and maybe uses some to make Subject’s life a little more productive as well, but with the explicit condition that Subject is going to have to pay these funds back with interest.
Subject doesn’t like this plan. He also sees that Sovereign has very little incentive not to overpromise what Subject is capable of.
Sovereign has two takers in his Subject bond offering, Investor and Leech. Investor is impressed by what Subject is capable of, and wants to keep him well funded to achieve more, and to profit in the process. Leech is a bully and a coward, and wants Sovereign to squeeze Subject for all he can. Both have purchased bonds for very different reasons, but both are very concerned by the writing on the wall. It’s becoming apparent that Subject is overworked. He’s lost his motivation, and he’s been giving so much to Sovereign and Sovereign’s creditors that he hasn’t been able to properly take care of himself. Payments meeting the exorbitant amounts Sovereign has promised are no longer a given.
Naturally, Sovereign is troubled greatly by this development. If Subject underperforms, his gravy train derails: Not only does he lose his direct revenue stream, but also his take from controlling access to Subject.
This is similarly a catastrophe for Leech, as he’s been counting on Sovereign keeping Subject producing. Leech doesn’t have the strength or courage to push Subject around himself, so he’s been content to get his cut from funding Sovereign’s bullying efforts. But with recent developments, he’s starting to get cold feet.
Investor is worried too. Specifically, he’s worried what Sovereign and Leech might do to Subject if he doesn’t meet Sovereign’s demands. Sovereign might just kill him in a fit of rage. Leech might give up on Sovereign altogether and just try to extract what Sovereign promised him directly from Subject.
Poor Subject. He’s saying to anyone who will listen “I never asked for this! I wanted to be left alone. I promised nothing to anyone. Why should this be my problem?”
Investor sympathizes. He’s always seen Sovereign’s involvement as an obstacle, not an asset. Investor always saw his bond purchase as a way of buying into the opportunity that Subject represented.
Leech is having none of it. He has no qualms about trying to hold Subject responsible for Sovereign’s promises. All he knows is that he was promised a guaranteed return, and he’s gonna get it one way or another.
What honest man would blame an equally honest fellow man for refusing to honor debt incurred by others? How would such a default constitute a moral failing? When a private individual incurs debts in another’s name without his consent, that is called identity theft. Why is it considered to be a binding agreement when perpetrated by government?
When I hear of the legacy of debt I and my children and my children’s children will be buried under, all I can think is “Hell no. I’m not gonna pay.” Let’s get this crap off the balance sheet. It doesn’t belong there. We need to throw out the bums who thought it was proper to promise our labor, and to repudiate the debt incurred by them. I have no sympathy for the creditors who thought it was safe to count on our compliance. And for those creditors who thought they were making an investment, I’m sorry, but you were mistaken, and you are a victim as much as we have been. Let’s get up, dust ourselves off, leave Sovereign and Leech in the wreckage of their ill-conceived plan, and work together directly from now on.
4 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
I get knocked down but I get up again.
Great Post I posted the link for others to read.
AMEN!
Love the blog, could you blog roll me?
Id like to agree, but Subject authorized Sovereign to represent him, no? Remember democracy? And the dirty secret of democracy – if you vote at all, you’re morally bound to the result even if your favorite didnt win.
Unless you’ve NOT voted at all, you’ve lent your authority as a citizen to the creation of that debt. Every election cycle in which you’ve voted, any additional national debt that was incurred during the next 4 years by that administration is partly yours.
And though we as children did not authorize the debts of our parents, if we accepted inheritance of their worldly estates then we accepted their debt obligation as well.
I have the utmost respect for the ideal that Rand’s Galt represented, but we have no moral escape from this. The deadbeat door, and all the shame that it rightly imparts, is our only practical exit now.
Except for me. I stopped voting for my sovereign candidates years ago. I’ll accept my share of Clinton’s national debt legacy because I foolishly voted in that election, but before and after I wasnt involved. So this mess aint mine!